Publication outcome of abstracts submitted to the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting

Michael Mimouni, Mark Krauthammer, Hamza Abualhasan, Hanan Badarni, Kamal Imtanis, Gilad Allon, Liron Berkovitz, Eytan Z. Blumenthal, Francis B. Mimouni, Gil Amarilyo

Abstract


Objective: Abstracts submitted to meetings are subject to less rigorous peer review than full-text manuscripts. This study aimed to explore the publication outcome of abstracts presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) annual meeting.

Methods: Abstracts presented at the 2008 AAO meeting were analyzed. Each presented abstract was sought via PubMed to identify if it had been published as a full-text manuscript. The publication outcome, journal impact factor (IF), and time to publication were recorded.

Results: A total of 690 abstracts were reviewed, of which 39.1% were subsequently published. They were published in journals with a median IF of 2.9 (range 0–7.2) and a median publication time of 426 days (range 0–2,133 days). A quarter were published in the journal Ophthalmology, with a shorter time to publication (median 282 vs. 534 days, p=0.003). Oral presentations were more likely to be published than poster presentations (57.8% vs. 35.9%, p<0.001) and in journals with higher IFs (3.2 vs. 2.8, p=0.02). Abstracts describing rare diseases had higher publication rates (49.4% vs. 38.0%, p=0.04) and were published in higher IF journals (3.7 vs. 2.9, p=0.03), within a shorter period of time (358 vs. 428 days, p=0.03). In multivariate analysis, affiliation with an institute located in the United States (p=0.002), abstracts describing rare diseases (p=0.03), and funded studies (p=0.03) were associated with publication in higher IF journals.

Conclusions: Almost 40% of abstracts were published. Factors that correlated with publication in journals with higher IF were a focus on rare diseases, affiliation with a US institute, and funding.

Keywords


Ophthalmology, Publication; Outcomes; Abstracts; Meeting; Impact Factor

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000005.

Autorino R, Quarto G, Sio MD, Lima E, Quarto E, Damiano R, Oliviero R, Osorio L, Marcelo F, D’Armiento M. Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology: are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? J Endourol. 2006 Dec;20(12):996–1001.

Housri N, Cheung MC, Gutierrez JC, Zimmers TA, Koniaris LG. SUS/AAS abstracts: what is the scientific impact? Surgery. 2008 Aug;144(2):322–31.

Smollin CG, Nelson LS. Publication of abstracts presented at 2001 NAACT. J Med Toxicology. 2006 Sep;2(3):97–100.

Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1428–35.

Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey JB, Parrow KA, Tsai CS, Briggs KS. Pattern of publication of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Ophthalmology. 1991 Apr;98(4):553–6.

Amarilyo G, Woo JM, Furst DE, Hoffman OL, Eyal R, Piao C, Parker DS, McCurdy DK. Publication outcomes of abstracts presented at an American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals annual scientific meeting. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Apr;65(4):622–9.

Wong CX, Wong MX, Wong NX, Sun MT, Brooks AG, Stiles MK, Lau DH, Nelson AJ, De Sciscio P, Shipp NJ, Sanders P. Impact of research presentations at the annual scientific sessions of the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Sep;6(9):1345–8.

Basilious A, Benavides Vargas AM, Buys YM. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2010 Canadian Ophthalmological Society annual meeting. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;52(4):343–8.

Okonkwo AC, Hogg HD, Figueiredo FC. An 8-year longitudinal analysis of UK ophthalmic publication rates. Eye (Lond). 2016 Nov;30(11):1433–8.

Saldanha IJ, Scherer RW, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Jampel HD, Dickersin K. Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication. Trials. 2016 Apr 26;17(1):213.

Ofri R, Bdolah-Abram T, Yair N. Factors affecting peer-reviewed publication of abstracts presented at meetings of the European College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists (2008–2012). Vet Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 1:533–8.

American Academy of Ophthalmology. Submission instructions [Internet]. The Academy [cited 20 Sep 2017]. .

Elliott DB. The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):4–7.

Cartwright VA, Savino PJ. Ophthalmology journals and the ether: considering journal impact factor and citation analysis in context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;37(9):833–5.

Ho RC, Mak KK, Tao R, Lu Y, Day JR, Pan F. Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 7;13:74.

Cameron C, Deming SP, Notzon B, Cantor SB, Broglio KR, Pagel W. Scientific writing training for academic physicians of diverse language backgrounds. Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):505–10.

Patsopoulos NA, Ioannidis JP, Analatos AA. Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1061–4.

Buchkowsky SS, Jewesson PJ. Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Apr;38(4):579–85.

Luzzatto L, Hollak CE, Cox TM, Schieppati A, Licht C, Kääriäinen H, Merlini G, Schaefer F, Simoens S, Pani L, Garattini S, Remuzzi G. Rare diseases and effective treatments: are we delivering? Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):750–2.

Kesselheim AS, Tan YT, Avorn J. The roles of academia, rare diseases, and repurposing in the development of the most transformative drugs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):286–93.

Chen H, Chen CH, Jhanji V. Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1697–701.

Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Spijker R, Saldanha IJ, Dickersin K, Virgili G, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:96–103.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.314

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Mimouni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.