Shared first authorship

Amy Lapidow, Paige Scudder

Abstract


In most scientific communities, the order of author names on a publication serves to assign credit and responsibility. Unless authors are presented in alphabetical order, it is assumed that the first author contributes the most and the last author is the driving force, both intellectually and financially, behind the research. Many, but not all, journals individually delineate what it means to be a contributing author and the nature of each author’s role. But what does this mean when a paper has co-first authors? How are academic librarians going to handle questions surrounding co-first authorship in an era in which author metrics are important for career advancement and tenure? In this commentary, the authors look at the growing trend of co-first authorship and what this means for database searchers.

Keywords


Coauthorship; Publishing; Authorship; Multi-Authorship

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


King C. Multiauthor papers: onward and upward. ScienceWatch Newsletter [Internet]. 2012 [cited 7 Jan 2019]. .

Corrêa Jr EA, Silva FN, da F. Costa L, Amancio DR. Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts. J Informetrics. 2017 May;11(2):498–510.

Yang S, Wolfram D, Wang F. The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals. Scientometrics. 2017 Mar;110(3):1273–96.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations: defining the role of authors and contributors [Internet]. The Committee [cited 24 Jul 2018]. .

Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS. The meaning of author order in medical research. J Investig Med. 2007 May;55(4):174.

Abambres M, Arab P. Citation indexes accounting for authorship order in coauthored research—review and new proposal. Sci Technol Libr. 2016 Oct;35(4):263–78.

Campbell P. Policy on paper’s contributors. Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):393.

Kim J, Diesner J. Coauthorship networks: a directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015 Dec;66(12):2685–96.

Conte ML, Maat SL, Omary MB. Increased co-first authorships in biomedical and clinical publications: a call for recognition. FASEB J. 2013 Oct;27(10):3902–4.

Dubnansky E, Omary MB. Acknowledging joint first authors of published work: the time has come. Gastroenterology. 2012 Oct;143(4):879–80.

Tao T, Bo L, Wang F, Li J, Deng X. Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period. Scientometrics. 2012 Jun;91(3):1005–10.

Barnes C. The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2017 Nov 1;43(6):487–94.

Ghani R, Qayyum F, Afzal MT, Maurer H. Comprehensive evaluation of h-index and its extensions in the domain of mathematics. Scientometrics. 2019 Mar 1;118(3):809–22.

Moulopoulos SD, Sideris DA, Georgilis KA. For debate...individual contributions to multiauthor papers. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Nov 26;287(6405):1608–10.

Jacobs C, McIntosh M, O’Sullivan M. Collaborative authorship as peer mentorship [editorial]. Coll Res Libr. 2018 Jul;79(5):606–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.5.606.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.700

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Paige Scudder, Amy Lapidow

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.