Grey literature citations in top nursing journals: a bibliometric study

Authors

  • Stephen Woods University Libraries, Penn State University, University Park, PA
  • Kathleen Phillips Nursing and Allied Health Liaison Librarian, Life Sciences Library, University Libraries, Penn State University, University Park, PA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-6354
  • Andrew Dudash University Libraries, Penn State University, University Park, PA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.760

Keywords:

Grey Literature, Bibliometric Study, Nursing Literature, Government Documents

Abstract

Objective: As access to information grows in tandem with the growth of the Internet, access to grey literature also increases. Because little is known about the use of grey literature in nursing journals, the authors investigated the prevalence and types of grey literature citations in top nursing journals.

Methods: We analyzed all citations (n=52,116) from articles published in 2011 in 6 top nursing journals selected from the Medical Library Association’s Nursing and Allied Health Resource Section’s 2012 “Selected List of Nursing Journals.” Grey literature citations were identified and categorized by type.

Results: Grey literature accounted for 10.4% of citations across all 6 journals. Publications from governments (54.3%) and corporate organizations (26.8%) were the most common types of grey literature.

Conclusion: The substantial citation of grey literature in nursing journals shows that nursing scholars seek and use this category of information. These findings have implications for teaching and learning among nursing researchers and the information professionals who serve the nursing research community.

References

Marzi C, Pardelli G, Sassi M. A terminology based re-definition of grey literature. Int J Grey Lit. 2011 Spring;7(1):19–23.

Farace DJ. Foreword: perspectives on the design and transfer of scientific and technical information. In: Conference proceedings: Third International Conference on Grey Literature; Luxembourg; 1997. p. iii. ISBN: 90-74854-17-6.

Schöpfel J, Stock C, Farace DJ, Frantzen J. Citation analysis in grey literature: stakeholders in the grey circuit. Grey J. 2005 Spring;1(1):31–40.

Gibb JM, Phillips E. A better fate for the grey or non-conventional literature. J Res Comm Stud. 1978/1979;1:225–34.

Banks MA. Towards a continuum of scholarship: the eventual collapse of the distinction between grey and non-grey literature. Publ Res Q. 2006;22(1):4–11.

Sibbald SL, MacGregor JCD, Surmacz M, Wathen CN. Into the gray: a modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jan;103(1):49–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.010.

O’Neill AL, Duffey MA. Communication of research and practice knowledge in nursing literature. Nurs Res. 2000 Jul–Aug;49(4):224–30.

Estabrooks CA, Winther C, Derksen L. Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nurs Res. 2004 Sep–Oct;53(5):293–303.

Beckstead JW, Beckstead LG. A multidimensional analysis of the epistemic origins of nursing theories, models, and frameworks. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jan;43(1):113–22.

Oermann MH, Nordstrom CK, Wilmes NA, Denison D, Webb SA, Featherston DE, Bednarz H, Striz P, Blair DA, Kowalewski K. Dissemination of research in clinical nursing journals. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):149–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01975.x.

Oermann MH, Nordstrom CK, Wilmes NA, Denison D, Webb SA, Featherston DE, Bednarz H, Striz P. Information sources for developing the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):580–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.005.

Coad J, Hardicre J, Devitt P. Searching for and using grey literature. Nurs Times. 2006;102(50):35–6.

Allen MP, Jacobs SK, Levy JR. Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Apr;94(2):206–20.

Watwood CL. Mapping the literature of pediatric nursing: update and implications for library services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):278–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.005.

Pelzer NL, Wiese WH. Bibliometric study of grey literature in core veterinary medical journals. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Oct;91(4):434–41.

Sherwill-Navarro P, Kennedy JC, Allen MP. Developing an evidence-based list of journals for nursing. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):105–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.009.

NAHRS Research Committee Journal Project Team. NAHRS selected list of nursing journals [Internet]. Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section (NAHRS), Medical Library Association; 2012 [cited 31 Jan 2019]. <https://sites.google.com/site/nahrsnursingresources/selected-journals-list>.

Rowe N. Tracing the ‘grey literature’ of poster presentations: a mapping review. Health Inf Libr J. 2017;34:106–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12177.

Ania LO. Grey literature and library and information studies (LIS): a global perspective. In: Fourth International Conference on Grey Literature: new frontiers in grey literature. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: GreyNet; 2000. p. 25–31.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

Issue

Section

Original Investigation