Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based model to support the educational needs of researchers

Stephanie Clare Roth

Abstract


To meet the current needs of researchers who perform systematic reviews in health care settings, libraries need to provide high-quality educational services for researchers as part of their systematic review services. A team of librarians with diverse skills is also important for ensuring the growth and sustainability of systematic review services. This commentary describes a new team-based systematic review service model that can transform systematic review services by providing a pathway for librarians to offer a comprehensive educational service for systematic review research in a variety of health sciences library settings.

Keywords


Systematic Review Service; Systematic Reviews; Learning Outcomes; Team-Based Services

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Schell CL, Rathe RJ. Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific discoveries. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Jul;80(3):219–22.

Mead TL, Richards DT. Librarian participation in meta-analysis projects. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Oct;83(4):461–4.

Dudden R, Protzko S. The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011 Jul;30(3):301–15.

Qiu MK, Cedrone ME, Chen Y, Liu YL, Treadwell JR. Advancing a librarian’s role in a rapid review: data screening. Presented at: MLA ’17, the 117 the Annual Meeting of the Medical Library Association; Seattle, WA; 29 May 2017.

Foster M. An overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: from expert search to project manager. J Eur Assoc Health Inf Libr. 2015;11(3):3–7.

Spencer AJ, Eldredge JD. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.82.

Hardi AC, Fowler SA. Evidence-based medicine and systematic review services at Becker Medical Library. Mo Med. 2014 Sep–Oct;111(5):4165–8.

Ludeman E, Downton K, Shipper AG, Fu Y. Developing a library systematic review service: a case study. Med Ref Serv Q. 2015;34(2):173–80.

Knehans A, Dell E, Robinson C. Starting a fee-based systematic review service. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016 Jul–Sep;35(3):266–73.

Roth S, Burstein K. Implementing a formal systematic review service in an academic health science library setting [conference poster]. Philadelphia, PA; Medical Library Association Tri-Chapter Meeting; Mid-Atlantic Chapter (MAC), New York-New Jersey Chapter (NY-NJ), and Philadelphia Regional Chapter; 2016. (Available from: . [cited 4 Jan 2018].)

Jewell ST, Foster MJ, Dreker M. The art of puzzle solving: systematic review services. In: Foster MJ, Jewell ST, eds. Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: guide for librarians. (Medical Library Association Books Series.) Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017. p. 183–201.

Nicholson J, McCrillis A, Williams JD. Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):385–93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.176.

Morton S, Berg A, Levit L, Eden J. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. National Academies Press; 2011.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan;4(1):1.

Roth S. Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based approach to the library systematic review service model [Internet]. Open Science Framework; 2017 Dec [cited 20 Feb 2018]. .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.430

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Stephanie Clare Roth, AHIP

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.