Collection practices for nontraditional online resources among academic health sciences libraries

Mary Shultz, Donna R. Berryman

Abstract


Objective: In recent years, individuals and small organizations have developed new online learning and information resources that are often marketed directly to students. In this study, these nontraditional online resources are defined as apps or other online resources that are not available through large and well-known publishers. The purposes of this study are to determine if academic health sciences libraries are licensing nontraditional online resources and to provide a snapshot of current collections practices in this area.

Methods: An online survey was designed and distributed to the email lists of the Collection Development Section of the Medical Library Association and Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries directors. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted with survey participants who volunteered to be contacted.

Results: Of the 58 survey respondents, 21 (36.2%) reported that their libraries currently licensed at least 1 nontraditional online resource, and 45 (77.6%) reported receiving requests for these types of resources. The resources listed by respondents included 50 unique titles. Of the 37 (63.8%) respondents whose library did not license nontraditional online resources, major barriers that were noted included a lack of Internet protocol (IP) authentication, licenses that charge per user, and affordable institutional pricing.

Conclusions: Evaluation criteria for nontraditional online resources should be developed and refined, and these resources should be examined over time to determine their potential and actual use by students. There is a growing demand for many of these resources among students, but the lack of financial and access models that serve libraries’ needs is an obstacle to institutional licensing.

Keywords


Collection Development; Nontraditional Resources

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Arzola R, Havelka S. Mobile apps in collection development. Charleston Advis. 2015 01;16(3):43–5.

DeRosa AP, Jewell ST. Establishing a mobile resources collection development policy. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2014;11(3):144–54.

Saragossi J, Costello L, Kasten K. Mobile applications in academic libraries. Libr Resour Tech Serv. 2018;62(4):198–204.

O’Hanlon R, Laynor G. Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education [commentary]. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):251–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.619.

Warne C. Test prep companies are more powerful than medical school. KevinMD.com: Social media’s leading physician voice [Internet]. 2017 [cited 11 Sep 2019]. .

Boards&Beyond. Testimonials: see what students who used Boards and Beyond are saying [Internet]. Boards&Beyond [cited 13 Feb 2020]. .

SketchyMedical. Step 1/pre-clinical pricing [Internet]. Sketchy Group [cited 13 Feb 2020]. .

Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jan;102(1):22–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.791

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Mary Shultz, Donna R. Berryman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.