What we talk about when we talk about medical librarianship: an analysis of Medical Library Association annual meeting abstracts, 2001–2019

Bethany Myers


Objective: This study seeks to gain initial insight into what is talked about and whose voices are heard at Medical Library Association (MLA) annual meetings.

Methods: Meeting abstracts were downloaded from the MLA website and converted to comma-separated values (CSV) format. Descriptive analysis in Python identified the number of presentations, disambiguated authors, author collaboration, institutional affiliation type, and geographic affiliation. Topics were generated using Mallet’s Latent Dirichlet Allocation algorithm for topic modeling.

Results: There were 5,781 presentations at MLA annual meetings from 2001–2019. Author disambiguation resulted in approximately 5,680 unique authors. One thousand ninety-three records included a hospital-related keyword in the author field, and 4,517 records included an academic-related keyword. There were 438 presentations with at least 1 international author. The topic model identified 16 topics in the MLA abstract corpus: events, electronic resources, publications, evidence-based practice, collections, academic instruction, librarian roles and relationships, technical systems, special collections, general instruction, literature searching, surveys, research support, community outreach, patient education, and library services.

Conclusions: Academic librarians presented more frequently than hospital librarians, though more research should be done to determine if this discrepancy was disproportionate to hospital librarians’ representation in MLA. Geographic affiliation was concentrated in the United States and appeared to be related to population density. Health sciences librarians in the early twenty-first century are spending more time at MLA annual meetings talking about communities, relationships, and visible services, and less time talking about library collections and operations. Further research will be needed to boost the participation of underrepresented members.


MLA; Medical Library Association; Conferences; Annual Meetings; Professional Organizations; Topic Modeling; Topic Model

Full Text:



Vega RD, Connell RS. Librarians’ attitudes toward conferences: a study. Coll Res Libr. 2007 Nov;68(6):503–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.6.503.

Hoffmann K, Berg S, Koufogiannakis D. Understanding factors that encourage research productivity for academic librarians. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2017 Dec 30;12(4):102–28.

Lessick S, Perryman C, Billman BL, Alpi KM, De Groote SL, Babin Jr. TD. Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Apr;104(2):166–73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.68.

Neville TM, Henry DB. Support for research and service in Florida academic libraries. J Acad Librariansh. 2007 Jan 1;33(1):76–93.

Smigielski EM, Laning MA, Daniels CM. Funding, time, and mentoring: a study of research and publication support practices of ARL member libraries. J Libr Adm. 2014 May 19;54(4):261–76.

Funk ME. Our words, our story: a textual analysis of articles published in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association/Journal of the Medical Library Association from 1961 to 2010. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jan;101(1):12–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.003.

Knott TL. Diversity and inclusion: top priorities for MLA. Full Speed Ahead [Internet]. 12 Dec 2016 [cited 13 Nov 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. Past and future meetings [Internet]. The Association [cited 9 Jul 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. MLA ’19 | Elevate [Internet]. The Association [cited 9 Jul 2019]. .

pdfminer/pdfminer.six. Python PDF parser: fork with Python 2+3 support [Internet]. pdfminer; 2019 [cited 9 Jul 2019]. .

Notepad++. Home [Internet]. Notepad++ [cited 9 Jul 2019]. .

Myers B. MLA meetings [Internet]. Myers B [cited 9 Jul 2019]. .

pandas. Python data analysis library [Internet]. pandas [cited 16 Jul 2019]. .

SeatGeek FuzzyWuzzy. Fuzzy string matching in Python [Internet]. SeatGeek; 2018 [cited 27 Sep 2018]. .

Plotly. Choropleth maps [Internet]. Plotly [cited 13 Nov 2019]. .

Myers B. US-affiliated authors, 2001–2019 [Internet]. Myers B [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Myers B. bethanymyers/mla [Internet]. Myers B; 2019 [cited 5 Sep 2019]. .

Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003 Jan;3:993–1022.

Sugimoto CR, Li D, Russell TG, Finlay SC, Ding Y. The shifting sands of disciplinary development: analyzing North American library and information science dissertations using latent dirichlet allocation. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;62(1):185–204.

spaCy. Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python [Internet]. spaCy [cited 17 Sep 2019]. .

NLTK Project. Natural language toolkit: NLTK 3.4.5 documentation [Internet]. NLTK Project [cited 17 Sep 2019]. .

Řehůřek R. gensim: topic modelling for humans [Internet]. Řehůřek R [cited 17 Sep 2019]. .

Řehůřek R. models.wrappers.ldamallet – latent dirichlet allocation via Mallet [Internet]. Řehůřek R [cited 17 Sep 2019]. .

Röder M, Both A, Hinneburg A. Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) ’15 [Internet]. Shanghai, China: ACM Press; 2015 [cited 30 Aug 2019]. p. 399–408. .

Mabey B. Python library for interactive topic model visualization. port of the R LDAvis package [Internet]. Mabey B; 2019 [cited 30 Aug 2019]. .

Myers B. MLA pyLDAvis [Internet]. Myers B [cited 5 Sep 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. Mosaic ’16: call for submissions [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. MLA ’17: papers, special content sessions, posters, and lightning talks [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. MLA ’18 FAQ: papers, posters, lightning talks, and special content sessions [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. MLA ’19 call for submissions [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Henry DB, Neville TM. Research, publication, and service patterns of Florida academic librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2004 Nov 1;30(6):435–51.

Medical Library Association. Medical Library Education Caucus [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Center for Health Workforce Studies. Health care employment projections, 2016–2026: an analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics projections by setting and by occupation [Internet]. The Center [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

National Center for Education Statistics. Indicators: the condition of education: postsecondary education: programs, courses, and completions: graduate degree fields [Internet]. The Center; Apr 2019 [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Johnson R, Watkinson A, Mabe M. The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing [Internet]. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers; Oct 2018 [cited 27 Mar 2020]. .

NEJM Catalyst. Big data in healthcare: challenges & promise [Internet]. NEJM Catalyst; 2018 [cited 5 Sep 2019]. .

Henriksen D. The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics. 2016 May 1;107(2):455–76.

National Library of Medicine. Number of authors per MEDLINE®/PubMed® citation [Internet]. The Library [cited 15 Jan 2020]. .

Medical Library Association. Communities home [Internet]. The Association [cited 8 Nov 2019]. .

Medical Library Association. International programs [Internet]. The Association [cited 15 Nov 2019]. .

Speaker SL. An historical overview of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, 1985–2015. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):162–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.297.

Harrow A, Marks LA, Schneider D, Lyubechansky A, Aaronson E, Kysh L, Harrington M. Hospital library closures and consolidations: a case series. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):129–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.520.

McCarthy LH. Evidence-based medicine: an opportunity for health sciences librarians. Med Ref Serv Q. 1996 Winter;15(4):63–71.

Klem ML, Weiss PM. Evidence-based resources and the role of librarians in developing evidence-based practice curricula. J Prof Nurs. 2005 Nov–Dec;21(6):380–7.

Perry GJ, Kronenfeld MR. Evidence-based practice: a new paradigm brings new opportunities for health sciences librarians. Med Ref Serv Q. 2005 Winter;24(4):1–16.

Gore SA, Nordberg JM, Palmer LA, Piorun ME. Trends in health sciences library and information science research: an analysis of research publications in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association from 1991 to 2007. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):203–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.009.

Marshall JG, Sollenberger J, Easterby-Gannett S, Morgan LK, Klem ML, Cavanaugh SK, Oliver KB, Thompson CA, Romanosky N, Hunter S. The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jan;101(1):38–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.007.

Wolff-Eisenberg C. US library survey 2016 [Internet]. Ithaka S+R [cited 15 Nov 2019]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.303066.

Plutchak TS. Breaking the barriers of time and space: the dawning of the great age of librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Jan;100(1):10–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.004.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.836


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Bethany Myers

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.