Conforming collections: assessing medical and allied health collections using Doody’s Core Titles
Keywords:collection development, medical and allied health collection, match, trend, Doody’s Core Titles
Objective: This study assessed the print collection of an Asian academic medical library using list-checking. The library’s book collection was matched to Doody’s Core Titles (DCT) subspecialties to identify strong and weak subject areas and understand temporal trends from 2014 to 2020.
Method: List checking was employed as the method of research.
Results: Basic sciences and nursing were the strongest subspecialties from 2018 to 2020, with many subjects having 100% matches, likely because most academic programs share the same basic sciences foundation subjects and nursing collections had been developed for many years as a long-standing program of the institution. Associated health-related disciplines was the weakest subspecialty.
Conclusion: These subjects need to be prioritized in collection development. All subspecialties exhibited an increasing trend of matching between 2014 and 2020. Electronic books were included in the matching to DCT 2020; however, the match was low compared to print only or both print and electronic titles. DCT title matching can not only identify gaps in library collections that need to be filled but also point toward opportunities to develop strong and varied collections in medicine and allied health.
Johnson P. Fundamentals of collection development and management. 3rd ed. London: Facet. 2014.
Crawley-Low JV. Collection analysis techniques used to evaluate a graduate-level toxicology collection. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):310-6.
Smith ET. Assessing collection usefulness: an investigation of library ownership of the resources of graduate students use. Coll Res Libr. 2003;64(5):344-355. DOI: http://doi:10.5860/crl.64.5.344
Nisonger TE, Meehan WF III. The Harvard and Yale university library rowing collections: a checklist evaluation and semi-availability study. Libr Collect Acquis. 2007;31(3-4):119-137.
Meehan WF III, Swanson MA, Yates CO, Decker EN. Sports holdings in the Southeastern conference university libraries: football as a case study. Southeast Libr. 2010;58(1):18-29.
Williams VK, Deyoe N. Diverse population, diverse collection? youth collections in the United States. Tech Serv Q. 2014;31(2): 97-121. DOI: 10.1080/07317131.2014.875373
Sherwill-Navarro P, Kennedy J, Allen M. Developing an evidence-based list of journals for nursing. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014; 102(2): 105-199. DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.009
Moberley H, Page J. Essential and core books for veterinary medicine. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018; 106(3): 304-310. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.391
Doody’s core titles in the health sciences, 2019 edition. [Internet]. [cited 1 April 2019]. Doody Enterprises. <http://www.doody.com/dct>.
Spasser MA. Review of Doody’s core titles in the health sciences 2004 (DCT 2004). Biomed Digit Libr. 2005;2:5. DOI:http://doi:10.1186/1742-5581-2-5.
Shedlock J, Walton LJ. Developing a virtual community for health sciences library book selection: Doody’s Core Titles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan;94(1):61-66.
Husted J, Czechowski L. rethinking the reference collection: exploring benchmarks and e-book availabity. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012; 31(3): 267-279. doi:10.1080/02763869.2012.698166
Torres E. Collection-based analysis of selected medical libraries in the Philippines using Doody’s Core Titles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017; 105(1): 20-26. doi:10.5195/jmla.2017.103.
Copyright (c) 2022 Efren Jr Torres, Zipporah Dery, Raquel Samar, Marlon Gado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.