Keywords:Citation analysis, bibliometrics, research impact, artificial intelligence, researcher tools
Nicholson J. A deep learning platform to evaluate the reliability of scientific claims by citation analysis [Internet]. NIH RePORTER; 2019 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9885663>.
Nicholson J. A deep learning platform to evaluate the reliability of scientific claims by citation analysis [Internet]. NIH RePORTER; 2020 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10136941>.
Lazebnik Y. Award #1913619 - SBIR Phase I: scite: a deep learning platform to identify confirming and refuting ci-tations [Internet]. National Science Foundation; 2020 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1913619>.
Herther NK. Scite.ai update part 1: cre-ating new opportunities [Internet]. Charleston Hub; 2021 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.charleston-hub.com/2021/02/scite-ai-update-part-1-creating-new-opportunities-an-atg-original/>.
Scite help desk. How are citations clas-sified? [Internet]. Scite; 2019 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://help.scite.ai/en-us/article/how-are-citations-classified-1a9j78t/>.
STM Publishing News. Aries systems and scite partner to evaluate research validity of manuscripts in EM [Inter-net]. STM Publishing News; 2021 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.stm-publishing.com/aries-systems-and-scite-partner-to-evaluate-research-validity-of-manuscripts-in-em-2/>.
Piller C. Disgraced COVID-19 studies are still routinely cited. Science. 2021 Jan 22; 371(6527):331–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.371.6527.331.
Nicholson J. All citations aren’t created equal [Internet]. The Wiley Network; 2020 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.wiley.com/network/latest-content/all-citations-aren-t-created-equal>.
Araujo D. Europe PMC integrates smart citations from scite.ai [Internet]. EuropePMC; 2020 [cited 26 Feb 2021]. <http://blog.europepmc.org/2020/01/europe-pmc-integrates-smart-citations.html>.
Rovira C, Codina L, Guerrero-Solé F, Lopezosa C. Ranking by relevance and citation counts, a comparative study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WOS and Scopus. Future Internet. 2019;11(9):202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11090202.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred report-ing items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Suelzer EM, Deal J, Hanus KL, Ruggeri B, Sieracki R, Witkowski E. Assessment of citations of the retracted article by Wakefield et al with fraudulent claims of an association between vaccination and autism. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(11):e1915552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15552.
Steen RG. Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011;37(11):688–92.
Nicholson JM, Uppala A, Sieber M, Grabitz P, Mordaunt M, Rife SC. Measuring the quality of scientific ref-erences in Wikipedia: an analysis of more than 115M citations to over 800 000 scientific articles. FEBS J. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15608.
Muller JZ. The tyranny of metrics [In-ternet]. The Chronicle of Higher Educa-tion; 2018 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-tyranny-of-metrics/>.
SAGE Publishing. Scite and Sage Pub-lishing sign indexing agreement to in-crease discoverability and reproduci-bility through smart citations [Internet]. SAGE Publishing; 2021 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://group.sagepub.com/press-releases/scite-and-sage-publishing-sign-indexing-agreement-to-increase-discoverability-and-reproducibility-through-smart-citations>.
Davis PM. The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Inter-net and in personal libraries. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(3):184–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.008.
Rosati D. How are journals cited? Characterizing journal citations by type of citation. ArXiv. 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11043.
Scite. Scite: smart citations for better re-search [Internet]. Scite; 2021 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://scite.ai>.
Brody S. The Unified Medical Lan-guage System: a scoping review of its use in research [Internet]. National Li-brary of Medicine; 2020 [cited 26 Apr 2021] <https://www.nlm.nih.gov/about/train-ing/associate/associate_projects/BrodyScopingReview2019.pdf>.
Scite help desk. How do I fix a mis-classified citation? [Internet]. Scite; 2019 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://help.scite.ai/en-us/article/how-do-i-fix-a-mis-classified-citation-7no39b/>.
Khamsi R. Coronavirus in context: Scite.ai tracks positive and negative ci-tations for COVID-19 literature. Na-ture. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01324-6.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 July;75:40–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
Edifix [Internet]. Edifix; 2021 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://edifix.com/features>.
Cited-By [Internet]. Crossref; 2021 [cit-ed 10 June 2021]. <https://www.crossref.org/services/cited-by/>.
Stillman D. Retracted item notifications with Retraction Watch integration [In-ternet]. Zotero; 2019 [cited 10 June 2021]. <https://www.zotero.org/blog/retracted-item-notifications/>.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.