Implementing an institution-wide electronic lab notebook initiative
Keywords:electronic lab notebook, institutional collaborations, information management
Background: To strengthen institutional research data management practices, the Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) licensed an electronic lab notebook (ELN) to improve the organization, security, and shareability of information and data generated by the school’s researchers. The Ruth Lilly Medical Library led implementation on behalf of the IUSM’s Office of Research Affairs.
Case Presentation: This article describes the pilot and full-scale implementation of an ELN at IUSM. The initial pilot of the ELN in late 2018 involved fifteen research labs with access expanded in 2019 to all academic medical school constituents. The Ruth Lilly Medical Library supports researchers using the electronic lab notebook by (1) delivering trainings that cover strategies for adopting an ELN and a hands-on demo of the licensed ELN, (2) providing one-on-one consults with research labs or groups as needed, and (3) developing best practice guidance and template notebooks to assist in adoption of the ELN. The library also communicates availability of the ELN to faculty, students, and staff through presentations delivered at department meetings and write-ups in the institution's newsletter as appropriate.
Conclusion: As of August 2021, there are 829 users at IUSM. Ongoing challenges include determining what support to offer beyond the existing training, sustaining adoption of the ELN within research labs, and defining “successful” adoption at the institution level. By leading the development of this service, the library is more strongly integrated and visible in the research activities of the institution, particularly as related to information and data management.
Harvard Longwood Medical Area. Electronic lab notebook comparison matrix [Internet]. Zenodo. 19 May 2021 [cited 12 Aug 2021]. <https://zenodo.org/record/4723753>.
Kloeckner F, Farkas R, Franken T, Schmitz-Rode T. Development of a prediction model on the acceptance of electronic laboratory notebooks in academic environments. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2014 Apr 1;59(2):95–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2013-0023.
Machina HK, Wild DJ. Electronic laboratory notebooks progress and challenges in implementation. J Lab Autom. 2013 Aug;18(4):264–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068213484471.
Marvin MC. Microsoft OneNote provides continuity for undergraduate biochemistry lab during a pandemic. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020 Sep;48(5):523–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21437.
Voegele C, Bouchereau B, Robinot N, McKay J, Damiecki P, Alteyrac L. A universal open-source electronic laboratory notebook. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2013 Jul 1;29(13):1710–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt253.
Guerrero S, Dujardin G, Cabrera-Andrade A, Paz-y-Miño C, Indacochea A, Inglés-Ferrándiz M, Nadimpalli HP, Collu N, Dublanche Y, De Mingo I, Camargo D. Analysis and implementation of an electronic laboratory notebook in a biomedical research institute. PLOS One. 2016 Aug 1;11(8):e0160428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160428.
Badiola KA, Bird C, Brocklesby WS, Casson J, Chapman RT, Coles SJ, Cronshaw JR, Fisher A, Frey JG, Gloria D, Grossel MC, Hibbert DB, Knight N, Mapp LK, Marazzi L, Matthews B, Milsted A, Minns RS, Mueller KT, Murphy K, Parkinson T, Quinnell R, Robinson JS, Robertson MN, Robins M, Springate E, Tizzard G, Todd MH, Williamson AE, Willoughby C, Yang E, Ylioja PM. Experiences with a researcher-centric ELN. Chem Sci. 2015 Mar 1;6(3):1614–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sc02128b.
Kanza S, Willoughby C, Gibbins N, Whitby R, Frey JG, Erjavec J, Zupančič K, Hren M, Kovač K. Electronic lab notebooks: can they replace paper? J Cheminformatics. 2017 May 24;9(1):31. DOI: https://doi.or/g10.1186/s13321-017-0221-3.
Wright JM. Make it better but don’t change anything. Autom Exp. 2009 Nov 19;1:5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-1-5.
Argento N. Institutional ELN/LIMS deployment: highly customizable ELN/LIMS platform as a cornerstone of digital transformation for life sciences research institutes. EMBO Rep. 2020 Mar 4;21(3):e49862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949862.
Rudolphi F, Goossen LJ. Electronic laboratory notebook: the academic point of view. J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Feb 27;52(2):293–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ci2003895.
Sayre F, Bakker C, Kelly J, Kocher M, Lafferty M. Support for electronic lab notebooks at top American research universities. J EScience Librariansh. 2018 Oct 19;7(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2018.1140.
Grynoch C. Finding connections in policies covering electronic laboratory notebook retention and transferal. J EScience Librariansh. 2021 Jan 19;10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1190.
IUSM Research Data Ownership and Retention Policy [Internet]. IU School of Medicine Policies [cited 4 Jan 2022]. Available from: https://policies.medicine.iu.edu/policies/ra-adm-0001/index.html.
Nosek B. Strategy for culture change [Internet]. 11 Jun 2019 Jun 11 [cited 8 Oct 2021]. <https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change>.
Copyright (c) 2022 Erin D. Foster, Elizabeth C. Whipple, Gabriel R. Rios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.