Disseminating medical literature and knowledge in India in the 1980s: the SMLRT story
Keywords:medical literature dissemination, medical literature dissemination in India’s history
The informed netizen of today is in a state of information overload. With 785 million broadband subscribers and an urban and rural teledensity of 138% and 60%, respectively , India is already the second-largest online digital market. Today, in theory, medical journals and textbooks can be accessed by anyone, anytime, anywhere, and at affordable rates. Fifty odd years ago, when the authors entered medical school, the use of computers in medical education was unknown in India, as in other parts of the world. It was in this milieu, thirty-seven years ago, that eleven young Madras (Chennai)-based doctors decided to make medical literature easily accessible, particularly to clinicians in suburban and rural India. The aim was to make relevant, affordable reprints easily available to the practitioner at their place of work or study. Photocopying and using the postal service was the chosen, and indeed the only available, mode of operation. This article will outline the methodology used, trials and tribulations faced, and persistence displayed. At that time, the processes deployed appeared relevant and truly innovative. Over the ensuing years, developments in information technology made the services redundant. Extensive, even revolutionary, changes such as universal digitization and availability of a cost-effective Internet radically changed how medical literature could be accessed in India.
Telecom Regulatory Authority. Highlights of Telecom Subscription Data as on 31 July 2021 [Internet]. Govt of India. 23 Sep 2021 [cited 28 Oct 2021]. <https://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/PR_No.44of2021.pdf>.
Ganapathy K. Science and art of reviewing papers to maintain standards in academia. Neurol India. 2021;69:1547–50.
Hirsch JA, Manchikanti L, Albuquerque FC, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lev MH, Linfante I, Mocco J, Rai AT, Schaefer PW, Tarr RW. The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:3–6.
Björk BC, Roos A, Lauri M. Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research. 2009;14(1):paper 391. Available from: http://InformationR.net/ir/14-1/paper391.html.
Committee on Science and Technology in Developing Countries (COSTED) [Internet]. Global Civil Society Database. [cited 28 Oct 2021]. <https://uia.org/s/or/en/1100029055>.
Kumudam. Chennai, India. [cited 28 Oct 2021]. <http://www.kumudam.com>.
Fitterling LA, Oro R. Preserving osteopathic antiquity through historical pamphlets and postcards. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):113–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.876. PMID: 31897059; PMCID: PMC6920009.
Pandya S. Coping with the medical literature. BMJ. 1989;299(6694):333. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29704906.
Healthcare and medical research. The Indian Express – Lifeline: A Weekly Feature Saturday. 1993 May 8.
Greenberg SJ. History matters. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.112. PMID: 28096753; PMCID: PMC5234443.
Copyright (c) 2022 Krishnan Ganapathy; Arjun Rajagopalan; Gita Arjun; Seshadri Suresh; Krishnan Sriram
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.