Sub-Saharan Africa's biomedical journal coverage in scholarly databases: a comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1448

Keywords:

Biomedical research, Sub-Saharan Africa, Web of Science, Scopus, AJOL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to find out the coverage of biomedical journals published in Sub-Saharan Africa in four authoritative international databases-Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE and EMBASE and two Africa-focused scholarly databases-Africa Journals Online (AJOL) and African Index Medicus (AIM).
Methods: Lists of active journals that are published in the 46 Sub-Saharan African countries were retrieved from the Ulrich periodical directory to create master journal lists. Unique journals from other databases that were not found in Ulrich were added to the master journal list. The six databases included in this study were searched for journals on the master lists.
Results: Only 23 of the 46 Sub-Saharan African countries had at least one biomedical journal. Only about one-quarter (152) of the 560 biomedical journals from Sub-Saharan Africa were found in at least one of the biomedical databases. South African journals accounted for more than 50% of all the Sub-Saharan journals in the international scholarly databases. AJOL contains the highest number of biomedical journals from Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Scopus and EMBASE. AJOL asserts its importance by covering the highest number of unique journals and having a representative number of journals in all biomedical sub-disciplines.
Conclusion: The majority of studies from Sub-Saharan Africa are left out when biomedical evidence-based researchers only retrieve studies from authoritative international databases. Searching Google Scholar and the African research databases of AJOL and AIM would increase the number of studies from the region.

Author Biography

Toluwase Victor Asubiaro, Library and Information Science Program Faculty of Information and Media Studies University of Western Ontario Canada

Doctoral Candidate

Library and Information Science Program

Faculty of Information and Media Studies
University of Western Ontario
Canada

References

Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Featherstone R, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf MI, Noel-Storr A, Paynter R, Rader T, Thomas J, Wieland S. Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 61 [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04#section-4-2-2.

Visser M, van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quant Sci Stud. 2021 Apr 8;2(1):20–41.

Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 2020 Feb 1;1(1):377–86.

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.

Harzing - AW. Do Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science speak your language? [Internet]. Harzing.com. 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 9]. Available from: https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/do-google-scholar-scopus-and-the-web-of-science-speak-your-language.

Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2016 Jan;106(1):213–28.

Tennant JP. Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. Eur Sci Ed. 2020 Oct 27;46:e51987.

Vera-Baceta MA, Thelwall M, Kousha K. Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics. 2019 Dec 1;121(3):1803–13.

Singh VK, Singh P, Karmakar M, Leta J, Mayr P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2021 Jun;126(6):5113–42.

Schoonbaert D. PubMed growth patterns and visibility of journals of Sub-Saharan African origin. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2009 Oct;97(4):241–3.

Hofman KJ, Kanyengo CW, Rapp BA, Kotzin S. Mapping the health research landscape in Sub-Saharan Africa: a study of trends in biomedical publications. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2009 Jan;97(1):41–4.

Nwagwu W. Mapping the landscape of biomedical research in Nigeria since 1967. Learn Publ. 2005;18(3):200–11.

Gavel Y, Iselid L. Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Inf Rev. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):8–21.

Pouris A, Ho YS. Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics. 2014 Mar;98(3):2169–84.

Olatunji OA. The Comparative Analysis of Rankings in South African and Nigerian Higher Education Systems. In: Adeyemo KS, editor. The Education Systems of Africa [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021 [cited 2022 Oct 21]. p. 887–902. (Global Education Systems). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44217-0_34.

Pouris A, Ho YS. Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics. 2014 Mar;98(3):2169–84.

Asubiaro T. Sub-Saharan Africa’s Biomedical Journal Coverage in Scholarly Databases: A comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, African Index Medicus and African Journals Online. Adv Soc Sci Humanit Pre-Prints. 2023 Available from: https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.17082719.v1.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-10

Issue

Vol. 111 No. 3 (2023): July 2023

Section

Original Investigation

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Toluwase Victor Asubiaro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.