The impact of libraries and informationists on patient and population care: a mixed-methods study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1520

Keywords:

assessment, population health, mixed methods, patient care, libraries, librarians

Abstract

Objective: While several studies have examined the effectiveness of librarian interactions with clinicians and impact of librarians on patient care, no studies have explored a library’s effects on population care. The goal of this study was to investigate the library’s impact on both patient and population care.

Methods: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, we first interviewed a small set of clinicians and researchers active in patient and population care. Based on the themes that we discovered through coding the interviews, we created a survey that was sent to faculty in the health sciences and the health system.

Results: We collected data from a representative sample of our population. We discovered that all respondents value the library and informationists, using our services most for teaching, publishing, presenting, and professional development.

Conclusion: We now have data to support our value to our population and to show where we can do more work to improve the use of our services. Our study shows the value of doing a mixed-methods sequential exploration in which themes that are important to our user community were identified prior to launching a large-scale survey.

References

DeRosa AP, Gibson DS, Morris EA (2017) Through the eyes of the Informationist: Identifying information needs of the Breast Imaging Service at a tertiary medical center specializing in cancer. Health Informatics J 23:208–217.

Urquhart CJ, Hepworth JB (1996) Comparing and using assessments of the value of information to clinical decision-making. Bull Med Libr Assoc 84:482–489.

King DN (1987) The contribution of hospital library information services to clinical care: a study in eight hospitals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 75:291–301.

Brandes S (2007) Experience and outcomes of medical librarian rounding. Med Ref Serv Q 26:85–92.

Esparza JM, Shi R, McLarty J, Comegys M, Banks DE (2013) The effect of a clinical medical librarian on in-patient care outcomes. J Med Libr Assoc 101:185–191.

Divall P, James C, Heaton M, Brettle A (2022) UK survey demonstrates a wide range of impacts attributable to clinical librarian services. Health Info Libr J 39:116–131.

Weightman AL, Williamson J, Library, Knowledge Development Network Q, Statistics G (2005) The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J 22:4–25.

Urquhart C, Turner J (2016) Reflections on the value and impact of library and information services: Part 2: impact assessment. Performance Measurement and Metrics 17:5–28.

Marshall JG, Sollenberger J, Easterby-Gannett S, Morgan LK, Klem ML, Cavanaugh SK, Oliver KB, Thompson CA, Romanosky N, Hunter S (2013) The value of library and information services in patient care: results of a multisite study. J Med Libr Assoc 101:38–46.

Marshall JG (1992) The impact of the hospital library on clinical decision making: the Rochester study. Bull Med Libr Assoc 80:169–178.

Loyola University New Orleans (2019) Population-Focused Healthcare. http://elearning.loyno.edu/masters-nursing-degree-online/resource/population-focused-healthcare.

Vukojević B (2016) Creswell JW: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, London: Sage publications, 2009. Politeia 6:191–194.

Creswell JW, Báez JC (2020) 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.

de Groote S, Scoulas JM (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on the use of the academic library. Reference Services Review 49:281–301.

Ruth Sara C, Lisa W, David C (2021) The Impact of COVID-19 on the Use of Academic Library Resources. Information Technology and Libraries. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12629.

Smith WG (2008) Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. Online submission.

Koos JA, Scheinfeld L, Larson C (2021) Pandemic-Proofing Your Library: Disaster Response and Lessons Learned from COVID-19. Med Ref Serv Q 40:67–78.

Teolis MG, Poletti EJ, Creazzo J, Steele FN, Castelli D, Mokonyama J (2021) Hospital Librarians Meet the Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Ref Serv Q 40:408–420.

Ali MY, Gatiti P (2020) The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic: reflections on the roles of librarians and information professionals. Health Info Libr J 37:158–162.

Charney RL, Spencer A, Tao D (2021) A Novel Partnership Between Physicians and Medical Librarians During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Ref Serv Q 40:48–55.

Sullo E, Brody S (2021) Providing Information to Support COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Academic Medical Librarians’ Roles in Creating an Intelligence Report. Med Ref Serv Q 40:23–34.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-11

Issue

Section

Original Investigation