Fostering change, empowering faculty: comments on the NURSLITT study and the five-year rule

Authors

  • Eleanor Shanklin Truex Ascension Saint Joseph Hospital
  • Jean Hillyer, AHIP
  • Emily N. Spinner Ellis Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1768

Keywords:

5-year Rule, Date Limits, Date Range, Literature Searches, Search Limits, Nurses, Nursing Faculty, Nursing Education, Nursing Research

Abstract

The five-year rule must die. Despite an extensive literature search, the origins of the five-year rule remain unknown. In an era when the nursing profession is so focused on evidence-based practice, any approach that arbitrarily limits literature searches to articles published in the previous five years lacks scientific basis. We explore some reasons for the pervasiveness of the practice and suggest that librarians need to engage with nursing faculty, who are well-positioned to be change agents in this practice.

References

Truex, Eleanor Shanklin, Emily Spinner, Jean Hillyer, A’Llyn Ettien, Sarah Wade, Courtney Calhoun, Grace Wolf, Rebecca Hedreen, Layla Heimlich, Annie Nickum, and Susan C. Vonderheid. "Exploring the Use of Common Strict Search Criteria in Nursing Literature Searches." Nurse Educator (2022): 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001353.

Stolley, Jacqueline M., Kathleen C. Buckwalter, and Linda Garand. "The Evolution Of Nursing Research." Journal of the Neuromusculoskeletal System: JNMS: A Journal of the American Chiropractic Association, Inc 8, no. 1 (2000): 10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6739074/.

Beaudry, Jeffrey S., and Lynne Miller., eds. 2016. Introduction to Research Literacy. In Research Literacy: A Primer for Understanding and Using Research, 4. Guilford Publications, 2016.

Hines, S., Ramsbotham, J., & Coyer, F. (2015). The Effectiveness Of Interventions For Improving the Research Literacy Of Nurses: A Systematic Review. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 12(5), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12106.

Hines, Sonia, Joanne Ramsbotham, and Fiona Coyer. "Interventions for Improving the Research Literacy of Nurses: A Systematic Review." JBI Evidence Synthesis 14, no. 2 (2016): 256-294. DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2378.

Chen, Qirong, Mei Sun, Siyuan Tang, and Aimee R. Castro. "Research Capacity In Nursing: A Concept Analysis Based on a Scoping Review." BMJ Open 9, no. 11 (2019): e032356. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032356.

Burns, Nancy, Susan K. Grove. “Chapter 6. Review of Relevant Literature.” In The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 92. Saunders Elsevier, 2009.

Greenbaum, Hannah. "The "outdated sources" myth." Last modified October 18, 2021. Accessed October 5, 2023. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/outdated-sources-myth.

Benjamin Murray (Deputy Executive Director, Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education), email message to author, September 15, 2023.

Verhey, Marilyn P. "Information Literacy in an Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation." Journal of Nursing Education 38, no. 6 (1999): 252-259. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19990901-05.

Heather D. Carter-Templeton. “Nurses' Information Appraisal Within the Clinical Setting.” Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN, (2013) 31(4), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182812ef6.

Weaver, Susan M. "Information Literacy: Educating for Life-long Learning." Nurse Educator 18, no. 4 (1993): 30-32. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8345922.

Lu, Hong, Yang Zhao, and Alison While. “Job Satisfaction Among Hospital Nurses: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 94 (2019): 21-31. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.011.

DeVon, Holli A., Michelle E. Block, Patricia Moyle‐Wright, Diane M. Ernst, Susan J. Hayden, Deborah J. Lazzara, Suzanne M. Savoy, and Elizabeth Kostas‐Polston. "A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability." Journal of Nursing Scholarship 39, no. 2 (2007): 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.

Sakalys, Jurate A. "Effects of an Undergraduate Research Course on Cognitive Development." Nursing Research 33, no. 5 (1984): 290-295.

Schuessler, Zohreh, Leolin Castillo, Sheranda Fessler, Robin Herrmann, Dora Kuntz, and Becky Spencer. "A Qualitative Description of Nurses' Experiences with Incorporating Research into Practice." The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 49, no. 7 (2018): 299-306. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20180613-05.

Byström, Katriina. "Information and Information Sources in Tasks of Varying Complexity." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, no. 7 (2002): 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10064.

Wakeham, Maurice. "Nurses—Their Information Needs and Use of Libraries: The News of Some Librarians." Health Libraries Review 10, no. 2 (1993): 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2532.1993.1020085.

Burns, Nancy, Susan K. Grove. “Chapter 7. Review of Relevant Literature.” In The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 126. Elsevier, 2017.

Cronje, Ruth J., and Susan D. Moch. "Part III. Reenvisioning Undergraduate Nursing Students as Opinion Leaders to Diffuse Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Settings." Journal of Professional Nursing 26, no. 1 (January 1, 2010): 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.03.002.

“Dishonoring Our Own.” HealthCare for Women International, 22, no.7 (October-November 2001): 613–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/073993301753235361.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-22

Issue

Section

Commentary