Making an impact: the new 2024 Medical Library Association research agenda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.1955Keywords:
Evidence Based Practice, Research, Question Formulation, Delphi Method, Research Agenda, Consensus, Leadership, Impact, Artificial Intelligence (AI)Abstract
Objective: This research project sought to identify those subject areas that leaders and researcher members of the Medical Library Association (MLA) determined to be of greatest importance for research investigation. It updates two previous studies conducted in 2008 and 2011.
Methods: The project involved a three-step Delphi process aimed at collecting the most important and researchable questions facing the health sciences librarianship profession. First, 495 MLA leaders were asked to submit questions answerable by known research methods. Submitted questions could not exceed 50 words in length. There were 130 viable, unique questions submitted by MLA leaders. Second, the authors asked 200 eligible MLA-member researchers to select the five (5) most important and answerable questions from the list of 130 questions. Third, the same 130 MLA leaders who initially submitted questions were asked to select their top five (5) most important and answerable questions from the 36 top-ranked questions identified by the researchers.
Results: The final 15 questions resulting from the three phases of the study will serve as the next priorities of the MLA Research Agenda. The authors will be facilitating the organization of teams of volunteers wishing to conduct research studies related to these identified top 15 research questions.
Conclusion: The new 2024 MLA Research Agenda will enable the health information professions to allocate scarce resources toward high-yield research studies. The Agenda could be used by journal editors and annual meeting organizers to prioritize submissions for research communications. The Agenda will provide aspiring researchers with some starting points and justification for pursuing research projects on these questions.
References
Medical Library Association. The MLA Research Imperative Executive Summary, Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association. Accessed March 10, 2024. Available from: <https://www.mlanet.org/p/do/sd/topic=574&sid=679>.
Medical Library Association. The Research Imperative: The Research Policy Statement of the Medical Library Association. Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association. Accessed March 10, 1954. Available from: < https://www.mlanet.org/research/policy/>.
Eldredge JD, Harris MR, Ascher MT. Defining the Medical Library Association research agenda: methodology and final results from a consensus process. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(3):178-185. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.006
Eldredge JD, Ascher MT, Holmes HN, Harris MR. The new Medical Library Association research agenda: final results from a three-phase Delphi study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(3):214-218. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.012
Harris MR, Holmes HN, Ascher MT, Eldredge JD. Inventory of research questions identified by the 2011 MLA research agenda Delphi study. Hypothesis 2013 Winter; 24(2): 5-16. Accessed March 10, 2024. Available from: <https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=737&tid=501&sid=644>.
Ascher MT, Eldredge JD. MLA Research Section’s Research Agenda Committee Systematic Review Project: a status report. Hypothesis 2017 Spring/Summer; 29 (1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.18060/25208
Boden C, Ascher MT, Eldredge JD. Learning while doing: program evaluation of the Medical Library Association Systematic Review Project. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(3):284-293. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.286
Gove PB, Merriam-Webster, Inc. Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster; 1993: 1930.
Baron J. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge University Press, 1988: 259-61.
Plous S. The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, 1993.
Moore DW. Measuring new types of question effects: additive and subtractive. Public Opinion Quarterly 2002; 66: 80-91.
Carp FM. Position effects on interview responses. Journal of Gerontology 1974; 29 (5): 581-87.
Marshall JG. The impact of the hospital library on clinical decision making: the Rochester study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992;80(2):169-178.
Klein MS, Ross FV, Adams DL, Gilbert CM. Effect of online literature searching on length of stay and patient care costs. Acad Med. 1994;69(6):489-495. doi:10.1097/00001888-199406000-00017
Klein MS, Ross F. End-user searching: impetus for an expanding information management and technology role for the hospital librarian. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85(3):260-268.
Gertner J. Moment of Truth. N Y Times Mag. 2023:34-40,42. https://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/magazines/moment-truth/docview/2840654056/se-2
Metz C, Schmidt G. Tech Leaders Urge a Pause in A.I., Citing 'Profound Risks to Society': [Business/Financial Desk]. New York Times Mar 30, 2023. https://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/tech-leaders-urge-pause-i-citing-profound-risks/docview/2792241939/se-2
Huang K. Alarmed by AI Chatbots, Universities Start Revamping How They Teach. New York TimesJan 16 , 2023. . https://libproxy.unm.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/alarmed-ai-chatbots-universities-start-revamping/docview/2765787821/se-2
Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin Company; 1979: 51-52, 74.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marie Ascher, Margaret Hoogland, Karen Heskett, Heather Holmes, Jonathan D. Eldredge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.