Using information literacy to teach medical entrepreneurship and health care economics
Keywords:Information Literacy, Teaching, Evidence-Based Practice, Libraries, Biomedical Engineering, Learning, Entrepreneurship, Inventions, United States Food and Drug Administration, Medical Devices
Objective: Entrepreneurship and innovative product design in health care requires expertise in finding and evaluating diverse types of information from a multitude of sources to accomplish a number of tasks, such as securing regulatory approval, developing a reimbursement strategy, and navigating intellectual property. The authors sought to determine whether an intensive, specialized information literacy training program that introduced undergraduate biomedical engineering students to these concepts would improve the quality of the students’ design projects. We also sought to test whether information literacy training that included active learning exercises would offer increased benefits over training delivered via lectures and if this specialized information literacy training would increase the extent of students’ information use.
Methods: A three-arm cohort study was conducted with a control group and two experimental groups. Mixed methods assessment, including a rubric and citation analysis, was used to evaluate program outcomes by examining authentic artifacts of student learning.
Results: Student design teams that received information literacy training on topics related to medical entrepreneurship and health care economics showed significantly improved performance on aspects of project performance relevant to health care economics over student design teams that did not receive this training. There were no significant differences between teams that engaged in active learning exercises and those that only received training via lectures. Also, there were no significant differences in citation patterns between student teams that did or did not receive specialized information literacy training.Conclusions: Information literacy training can be used as a method for introducing undergraduate health sciences students to the health care economics aspects of the medical entrepreneurship life cycle, including the US Food and Drug Administration regulatory environment, intellectual property, and medical billing and reimbursement structures.
Task Force on Academic Health Centers. Envisioning the future of academic health centers [Internet]. The Commonwealth Fund; 2003 Feb [cited 5 Apr 2018]. <http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2003/feb/envisioning-the-future-of-academic-health-centers>.
Phillips FS, Garman AN. Barriers to entrepreneurship in healthcare organizations. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2006 Winter/Spring;28(4):472–84.
Williams I. Organizational readiness for innovation in health care: some lessons from the recent literature. Health Serv Manage Res. 2011 Nov 1;24(4):213–8.
Grose TK. Invention roulette. ASEE Prism. 2016;26(1):36–9.
Stossel TP. Regulating academic-industrial research relationships—solving problems or stifling progress? N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 8;353(10):1060.
Johns MME, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring balance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest: promoting research while maintaining trust. JAMA. 2003 Feb 12;289(6):741–6.
Toner M, Tompkins RG. Invention, innovation, entrepreneurship in academic medical centers. Surgery. 2008 Feb 1;143(2):168–71.
Chatterji AK, Fabrizio KR. Using users: when does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? Strateg Manag J. 2014;35(10):1427–45.
Enderle JD, Bronzino JD. Introduction to biomedical engineering. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2012. p. 1271.
Carter DF, Ro HK, Alcott B, Lattuca LR. Co-curricular connections: the role of undergraduate research experiences in promoting engineering students’ communication, teamwork, and leadership skills. Res High Educ. 2016 May;57(3):363–93.
Lang AR, Martin JL, Sharples S, Crowe JA. The effect of design on the usability and real world effectiveness of medical devices: a case study with adolescent users. Appl Ergon. 2013 Sep;44(5):799–810.
Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, Crowe JA, Murphy E. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective. Appl Ergon. 2012 Jan;43(1):184–90.
Vincent CJ, Li Y, Blandford A. Integration of human factors and ergonomics during medical device design and development: it’s all about communication. Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):413–9.
Berglund J. The real world: BME graduates reflect on whether universities are providing adequate preparation for a career in industry. IEEE Pulse. 2015 Mar;6(2):46–9.
Bruce CS. Workplace experiences of information literacy. Int J Inf Manag. 1999 Feb 1;19(1):33–47.
Barnard A, Nash R, O’Brien M. Information literacy: developing lifelong skills through nursing education. J Nurs Educ Thorofare. 2005 Nov;44(11):505–10.
Milne C, Thomas JA. Are your foundations sound? information literacy and the building of holistic professional practitioners. In: 19th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: To Industry and Beyond; Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia; 7–10 Dec 2008 [cited 14 Nov 2016]. <http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16899/>.
Maggio LA, Kung JY. How are medical students trained to locate biomedical information to practice evidence-based medicine? a review of the 2007–2012 literature. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jul;102(3):184–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.008.
Blanco MA, Capello CF, Dorsch JL, Perry GJ, Zanetti ML. A survey study of evidence-based medicine training in US and Canadian medical schools. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jul;102(3):160–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.005.
Carroll AJ, Tchangalova N, Harrington EG. Flipping one-shot library instruction: using Canvas and Pecha Kucha for peer teaching. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Apr;104(2):125–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.006.
Nerz H, Bullard L. The literate engineer: infusing information literacy skills throughout an engineering curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2006.
Nerz HF, Weiner ST. Information competencies: a strategic approach. In: Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition Session [Internet]. 2001 [cited 18 Jan 2019]. <https://sites.asee.org/eld/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/10/00510_2001.pdf>.
Callison R, Budny D, Thomes K. Library research project for first-year engineering students: results from collaboration by teaching and library faculty. Ref Libr. 2005;43(89–90):93–106.
Willingham DT. Why don’t students like school? a cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
Klipfel KM, Cook DB. Learner-centered pedagogy: principles and practice. Chicago, IL: American Library Association; 2017. 208 p.
Zenios S, Makower J, Yock P, Brinton TJ, Kumar UN, Denend L, Krummel TM. Biodesign: the process of innovating medical technologies. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 806 p.
Carroll AJ, Hallman SJ. Library course tools for BME 352: biomedical engineering design and manufacturing II [Internet]. North Carolina State University Libraries [cited 14 Sep 2018]. <https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/course/BME/352>.
Carroll AJ, Hallman SJ. Library course tools for BME 451: biomedical engineering senior design I [Internet]. North Carolina State University Libraries [cited 14 Sep 2018]. <https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/course/BME/451>.
Carroll AJ, Sr AJD, McCall J, Ozturk HO, Umstead KA, Hallman S. Work in progress: health care economics and information literacy - resources for success in undergraduate biomedical engineering education. In: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition [Internet]. Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education; 2018 [cited 18 Jan 2019]. <https://peer.asee.org/board-9-work-in-progress-healthcare-economics-and-information-literacy-resources-for-success-in-undergraduate-biomedical-engineering-education>.
VentureWell. DEBUT competition guidelines [Internet]. VentureWell; 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 18]. <https://venturewell.org/guidelines/>.
National Institutes of Health. Design by biomedical undergraduate teams (DEBUT) challenge [Internet]. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 2013 [cited 17 Mar 2017]. <https://www.nibib.nih.gov/training-careers/undergraduate-graduate/design-biomedical-undergraduate-teams-debut-challenge>.
Carroll AJ, Hallman S, Umstead K, Ozturk H, McCall JV, Andrew J. DiMeo S. Student performance data [Internet]. 21 Jun 2018 [cited 14 Aug 2018]; <https://osf.io/e8nzp/>.
Carroll AJ, Hallman S, Umstead K, Ozturk H, McCall JV, Andrew J. DiMeo S. Student citation data. 21 Jun 2018 [cited 14 Aug 2018]; <https://osf.io/h9ydf/>.
Rafferty RS. The impact of library instruction: do first-year medical students use library resources specifically highlighted during instructional sessions? J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Jul;101(3):213–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.3.011.
Dorsch JL, Aiyer MK, Meyer LE. Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum on medical students’ attitudes and skills. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct;92(4):397–406.
Joint N. Teaching intellectual property rights as part of the information literacy syllabus. Libr Rev. 2006 Jul 1;55(6):330–6.
MacMillan D. Patently obvious: the place for patents in information literacy in the sciences. Res Strateg. 2005 Jan 1;20(3):149–61.
Thuna M, MacMillan D. Patents under the microscope: teaching patent searching to graduate and undergraduate students in the life sciences. Ref Serv Rev. 2010 Aug 17;38(3):417–30.
Seeber F. Patent searches as a complement to literature searches in the life sciences—a “how-to” tutorial. Nat Protoc. 2007 Oct;2(10):2418–28.
Deitering AM, Jameson S. Step by step through the scholarly conversation: a collaborative library/writing faculty project to embed information literacy and promote critical thinking in first year composition at Oregon State University. Coll Undergrad Libr. 2008 Jul 8;15(1–2):57–79.
Kong SC. Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: an experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Comput Educ. 2014 Sep 1;78:160–73.
Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science. 2011 Jun 3;332(6034):1213–6.
Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410–5.
Hsieh C, Knight L. Problem-based learning for engineering students: an evidence-based comparative study. J Acad Librariansh. 2008 Jan 1;34(1):25–30.
Hunt DP, Haidet P, Coverdale JH, Richards B. The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2003 Apr 1;15(2):131–9.
Barratt CC, Nielsen K, Desmet C, Balthazor R. Collaboration is key: librarians and composition instructors analyze student research and writing. Portal Libr Acad. 2009;9(1):37–56.
Robinson AM, Schlegl K. Student bibliographies improve when professors provide enforceable guidelines for citations. Portal Libr Acad. 2004 Apr 9;4(2):275–90.
Davis PM. The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: a 2000 update. Coll Res Libr. 2002 Jan 1;63(1):53–60.
Hurst S, Leonard J. Garbage in, garbage out: the effect of library instruction on the quality of students’ term papers. Electron J Acad Spec Librariansh. 2007;8(1).
Carlson J. An examination of undergraduate student citation behavior. J Acad Librariansh. 2006 Jan;32(1):14–22.
Reinsfelder TL. Citation analysis as a tool to measure the impact of individual research consultations. Coll Res Libr. 2012 May 1;73(3):263–77.
Niccum BA, Sarker A, Wolf SJ, Trowbridge MJ. Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2017 Aug 9;22(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1360722.
Wimmer E, Casucci T, Reed J, Rhodes N, Fogg B, Ferrill TJ, Morrison D, Mowdood A, Schmick D, Mirfakhrai M, Jones P. Medical innovation competition information support. In: Shipman JP, Ulmer BA, eds. Information and innovation: a natural combination for health sciences libraries. 1st ed. Medical Library Association Books Series. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2017. p. 99–115.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.