Impact of embedded librarianship on undergraduate nursing students’ information skills
Keywords:Embedded Librarian, Assessment, Collaboration, Nursing, Undergraduate Students
Background: One-shot library sessions have numerous drawbacks; most notably, they rarely have a long-term impact on students' research behavior or skill sets. Library literature notes that when students interact with an embedded librarian, their skills improve. While close partnerships with subject faculty are important, librarians must also assess students’ skill sets to determine the impact of these teaching efforts.
Case presentation: During the course, the embedded librarian used various activities and assignments to teach information-seeking skills, with the expected outcome of increased skill sets. This IRB-approved research project focused on measuring and assessing students’ information-seeking abilities before and after interacting with the embedded nursing librarian. Changes in students' information fluency skills were measured using pre- and post-tests.
Conclusions:The study results provide evidence of the benefits of the embedded librarianship model. Continued measurement of students’ skills acquisition is important to enable librarians and library administrators to show the positive impacts the library has on student learning and success.
ACRL Standards and Proficiencies for Instruction Librarians and Coordinators Revision Task Force. Roles and strengths of teaching librarians [Internet]. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 18]. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/teachinglibrarians.
Rinto EE, Cogbill-Seiders EI. Library instruction and themed composition courses: an investigation of factors that impact student learning. J Acad Libr. 2015 Jan 1;41(1):14–20.
Ursin L, Blakesley Lindsay E, Johnson CM. Assessing library instruction in the freshman seminar: a citation analysis study. Ref Serv Rev. 2004 Sep;32(3):284–92.
Portmann CA, Roush AJ. Assessing the effects of library instruction. J Acad Libr. 2004 Nov 1;30(6):461–5.
Coulter P, Clarke S, Scamman C. Course grade as a measure of the effectiveness of one-shot information literacy instruction. Public Serv Q. 2007 Jan;3(1/2):147–63.
Martin J. The information seeking behavior of undergraduate education majors: does library instruction play a role? Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2008 Dec 13;3(4):4–17.
Dewey BI. The embedded librarian: strategic campus collaborations. Resourc Shar & Inf Netw. 2004;17(1/2):5–17.
Shumaker D. The embedded librarian: innovative strategies for taking knowledge where it’s needed. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.; 2012.
Zanin-Yost A. Academic collaborations: linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning. Coll Undergrad Libr. 2018;25(2):150–63.
Macdonald K. Collaborative partnerships for library services: examples from a hospital library. J Hosp Libr. 2015;15(4):365–72.
Sharma P, Kumar K, Babbar P. Embedded librarianship: librarian faculty collaboration. Desidoc J Libr Inf Tech. 2014;34(6):455–60.
Blake L, Ballance D, Davies K, Gaines JK, Mears K, Shipman P, Connolly-Brown M, Burchfield V. Patron perception and utilization of an embedded librarian program. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):226–30.
Edwards M, Kumar S, Ochoa M. Assessing the value of embedded librarians in an online graduate educational technology course. Public Serv Q. 2010;6(2/3):271–91.
Wu L, Thornton J. Experience, challenges, and opportunities of being fully embedded in a user group. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017;36(2):138–49.
Foster MJ, Shurtz S, Pepper C. Evaluation of best practices in the design of online evidence-based practice instructional modules. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102(1):31–40.
Konieczny A. Experiences as an embedded librarian in online courses. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010;29(1):47–57.
Wu L, Betts VT, Jacob S, Nollan R, Norris T. Making meaningful connections: evaluating an embedded librarian pilot project to improve nursing scholarly writing. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013;101(4):323–6.
Kumar S, Edwards ME. Information literacy skills and embedded librarianship in an online graduate programme. J Inf Lit. 2013 Jun;7(1):3–17.
Erlinger A. Outcomes assessment in undergraduate information literacy instruction: a systematic review. Coll Res Libr. 2018 May;79(4):442–79.
Dang D, Dearholt SL, editors. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: model and guidelines. Third. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International; 2017.
Abromitis RA. How does pretesting for PubMed knowledge spark student learning? Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Oct 2;37(4):357–66.
Oakleaf M. A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education. J Acad Libr. 2014 Sep 1;40(5):510–4.
Yousef A. Faculty attitudes toward collaboration with librarians. Libr Philos Pract [Internet]. 2010;(512). Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/512.
Moran C. Disconnect: contradictions and disagreements in faculty perspectives of information literacy. Ref Libr. 2019;60(3):149–68.
Lemley T. Virtual embedded librarianship program: a personal view. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):232–4.
Schilling K, Applegate R. Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(4):258–69.
Farrell A, Goosney J, Hutchens K. Evaluation of the effectiveness of course integrated library instruction in an undergraduate nursing program. J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2013 Dec;164–75.