Words matter: interpretations and implications of “para” in paraprofessional

Hannah Schilperoort, Alvaro Quezada, Frances Lezcano

Abstract


Objective: While studies from the early 1990s show that library staff in nonlibrarian roles interpret the term “paraprofessional” as being demeaning to their roles, no recent research has been conducted on this topic. This study aims to investigate if health sciences library staff continue to have similar negative associations with the term “paraprofessional” and to determine if another term is preferred.

Methods: The authors conducted a literature review to identify terms used to categorize library staff in nonlibrarian roles. Using these terms, we created an online Qualtrics survey asking participants to rank terms by preference. We distributed the survey via thirty-six professional email discussion lists, including MEDLIB-L, thirty-three MLA chapter and caucus email discussion lists, DOCLINE-L, and ACRL-HSIG-L. Survey participants included full-time and part-time health sciences library staff in any nonlibrarian position. Responses from librarians were not accepted.

Results: Based on 178 completed surveys, “library staff” was the top choice of 49% of participants, over “other” (19%), “paraprofessional” (13%), “library support staff” (11%), “paralibrarian” (7%), and “nonprofessional” (1%). Although “library staff” was the top choice of participants across all ages, older participants (aged 45–75) preferred “library support staff” and “paraprofessional” to a greater degree than younger participants (aged 18–44), while younger participants preferred “other” to a greater degree. Out of 36 participants who specifically mentioned the terms “paraprofessional” or “paralibrarian,” 32 (89%) of those comments were negative, indicating that the “para” in “paraprofessional” and “paralibrarian” is either insulting, inapplicable, or unfamiliar.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that although the term “paraprofessional” may not intentionally be used to demean library staff, many library staff interpret the term to be demeaning to their roles. Instead, “library staff,” a more inclusive and less divisive term, was preferred by survey participants. In accordance with our results, we believe the term “paraprofessional” should no longer be used in library and information scholarly literature or professional discourse.

Keywords


Library Staff; Paraprofessional; Terminology; Inclusivity

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Levine-Clark M, Carter TM. Paraprofessional personnel. In: Levine-Clark M, Carter TM, ed. ALA glossary of library & information science. 4th ed. Chicago, IL: American Library Association; 2013. p. 188.

Merriam-Webster. Para- prefix [Internet]. Merriam-Webster [cited 11 Nov 2019]. .

Oberg LR. The emergence of the paraprofessional in academic libraries: perceptions and realities. Coll Res Libr. 1992 Mar;53(2):99–112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl_53_02_99.

Zhu L. The role of paraprofessionals in technical services in academic libraries. Libr Resour Tech Serv. 2012 Jul;56(3):127–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.56n3.127.

American Library Association. Library Support Staff Resource Center: overview of library support staff [Internet]. The Association [cited 11 Nov 2019]. .

Gremmels GS. Staffing trends in college and university libraries. Ref Serv Rev. 2013 Jun;41(2):233–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907321311326165.

Cox EJ, Myers AKD. What is a professional cataloger? Libr Resourc Tech Serv. 2011 Apr;54(4):212–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/lrts.54n4.212.

Dinkins D, Ryan SM. Measuring referrals: the use of paraprofessionals at the reference desk. J Acad Libr. 2010 Jul;36(4):279–86.

Oberg LR. Library support staff in an age of change: utilization, role definition and status [Internet]. ERIC Digest; 1995 [cited 20 Dec 2019]. .

Flaherty MG. The library staff development handbook: how to maximize your library’s most important resource. (Medical Library Association Book Series.) Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017.

American Library Association Office for Library Personnel Resources Standing Committee on Library Education. Terminology: world book-ALA goal award project on library support staff, issue paper #8 [Internet]. The Association; 17 Sep 1991 [cited 11 Nov 2019].

Reitz JM. Paraprofessional. In: Dictionary for library and information science [Internet]. ABC-CLIO; 2004–2014 [cited 11 Nov 2019]. .

Social Science Statistics. Chi-square test calculator [Internet]. Stangroom J; 2020 [cited 17 Jul 2020]. .

Social Science Statistics. Z score calculator for 2 population proportions [Internet]. Stangroom J; 2020 [cited 17 Jul 2020]. .

American Library Association. B.9.7 Inclusiveness and mutual respect. In: ALA policy manual [Internet]. The Association; 2019 [cited 11 Nov 2019]. .

Brewer J, Dianna F. ALA policy on inclusiveness and mutual respect, 2004–2005 ALA CD#49 (ALA policy reference file) [Internet]. American Library Association; 2005 [cited 11 Nov 2019]. .

Vela S. Knowledge management, diversity, and professional hierarchies in libraries. J Libr Adm. 2018 Jan;58(8):835–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1516950.

Hill C. The professional divide: examining workplace relationships between librarians and library technicians. Aust Libr J. 2014, Apr;63(1):23–34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.890020.

Litwin R. The library paraprofessional movement and the deprofessionalization of librarianship. Progress Libr. 2009 Summer/Fall;33:43–60. (Available from: . [cited 2 Oct 2020].)

Brown J, Ferretti JA, Leung S, Méndez-Brady ML. We here: speaking our truth. Libr Trends. 2018 Summer;67(1):163–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2018.0031.

Jones SD, Murphy B. Recruiting and retaining a diverse workforce. In: Jones SD, Murphy B, eds. Diversity and inclusion in libraries: a call to action and strategies for success. (Medical Library Association Book Series.) Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2019. p. 75–88.

Hathcock A. White librarianship in blackface: diversity initiatives in LIS [Internet]. Libr Lead Pipe. 7 Oct 2015 [cited 14 Jun 2020]. .

Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO. Library professionals: facts & figures, 2019 fact sheet [Internet]. The Department; 2019 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force. Medical Library Association Diversity and Inclusion Task Force 2019 survey report preprint available. MLAConnect [Internet]. 13 Feb 2020 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

Medical Library Association. MLA salary surveys, 1983–2017: 2017 MLA compensation & benefits survey [Internet]. The Association; 2017 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

American Library Association Office for Research and Statistics. Member demographics study: January 2017 demographics update [Internet]. The Association; 2017 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

American Library Association. Diversity counts 2012 tables [Internet]. The Association; 2012 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

Epstein BA. Newly appointed diversity task force announced. Full Speed Ahead [Internet]. Medical Library Association; 2017 [cited 3 May 2020]. .

Medical Library Group of Southern California and Arizona. MLGSCA library staff excellence award [Internet]. The Group; 2020 [cited 3 May 2020]. .




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Hannah Schilperoort, Alvaro Quezada, Frances Lezcano

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.